What was a common sentiment among framers regarding Congress and democracy?

The sentiment among the framers of the Constitution regarding Congress and democracy reflected a particular concern about the potential pitfalls of excessive democracy, which is the correct interpretation here. The framers recognized that while the government should be accountable to the people, unchecked democracy could lead to mob rule or hasty decisions driven by temporary passions rather than well-considered policies.

This concern was rooted in their awareness of historical examples, such as the excesses seen in some democratic city-states and their belief in the need for a system that balances popular will with stability and sound governance. To address these fears, they created a representative system—a framework wherein elected officials would moderate the influence of the populace and engage in deliberative decision-making. This design not only sought to prevent the tyranny of the majority but also to incorporate checks and balances that would ensure that various interests within society were represented in a thoughtful manner.

The other sentiments reflected in the incorrect choices indicate varying perspectives on democracy. The framers did embrace elements of popular sovereignty, but they aimed to temper this with a representative model rather than pure direct democracy. They did not fully subscribe to the idea of direct democracy; instead, they favored a system where elected representatives would make decisions on behalf of their constituents. Furthermore, rejecting representative government